Going slow to go fast: public response and engagement in renewable energy projects

/by

Boudet, H. S., S. Hazboun, C. Haggett and S. Batel (2025). Going slow to go fast: public response and engagement in renewable energy projects. Nat. Rev. Clean Technol. DOI: 10.1038/s44359-025-00116-3.

The effect of industry activity on public support for “fracking”

/by

Boudet, H. S., D. Bugden, C. Zanocco and E. Maibach (2016). The effect of industry activity on public support for “fracking”. Environmental Politics 25(4): 593-612.

Natural Gas: Friend or Foe

/by

Hazboun, S. and H. S. Boudet (2021). Natural gas – friend or foe of the environment? Evaluating the framing contest over natural gas through a public opinion survey in the Pacific Northwest. Environmental Sociology.

Microgrid policy regulation in California and Oregon – A comparative state review

/by

Furqan, M. and H. S. Boudet (2026). Microgrid policy regulation in California and Oregon – A comparative state review. Energy Policy 210: 115081. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2026.115081.

An “insiteful” comparison: Contentious politics in liquefied natural gas facility siting in the US

/by

Boudet, H. S. (2016). An “insiteful” comparison: Contentious politics in liquefied natural gas facility siting in the US. MIT Projections 11: 47-76.

Getting closer

/by

Boudet, H. S. (2021).  Getting Closer. Nature Energy 6 (945-946).

Beyond yes and no: Clustering public perceptions of wave energy on the West Coast of the United States

/by

Stelmach, G. and H. S. Boudet (2026). Beyond yes and no: Clustering public perceptions of wave energy on the West Coast of the United States. Energy Research & Social Science 134: 104619. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2026.104619.

How geographic distance and political ideology interact to influence public perception of unconventional oil/natural gas development

/by

Clarke, C. E., D. Bugden, P. S. Hart, R. C. Stedman, J. B. Jacquet, D. T. N. Evensen and H. S. Boudet (2016). How geographic distance and political ideology interact to influence public perception of unconventional oil/natural gas development. Energy Policy 97: 301-309.

Using Structural Topic Modeling to Explore the Role of Framing in Shaping the Debate on Liquefied Natural Gas Terminals in Oregon

/by

Stelmach, G. and H. S. Boudet (2021). Using Structural Topic Modeling to Explore the Role of Framing in Shaping the Debate on Liquefied Natural Gas Terminals in Oregon. American Behavioral Scientist, DOI: 10.1177/00027642211056268.

Transactional or transformative? Offshore wind developer perspectives on community benefit mechanisms in the United States

/by

Ruscetta, L., E. Korein, E. Miller, J. Bingham, J. Firestone, S. Hazboun and H. S. Boudet (2026). Transactional or transformative? Offshore wind developer perspectives on community benefit mechanisms in the United States. Energy Research & Social Science 134: 104625. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2026.104625.