An “insiteful” comparison: Contentious politics in liquefied natural gas facility siting in the US

/by

Boudet, H. S. (2016). An “insiteful” comparison: Contentious politics in liquefied natural gas facility siting in the US. MIT Projections 11: 47-76.

Time of Use Pricing and Shifting

/by

Muttaqee, M., G. Stelmach, C. Zanocco, J. Flora, R. Rajagopal and H. S. Boudet (2024). Time of use pricing and likelihood of shifting energy activities, strategies, and timing. Energy Policy. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114019.

Exploring the effects of California’s COVID-19 shelter-in-place order on household energy practices and intention to adopt smart home technologies

/by

Zanocco, C., J. Flora, R. Rajagopal and H. S. Boudet (2020). Exploring the effects of California’s COVID-19 shelter-in-place order on household energy practices and intention to adopt smart home technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

Event attribution and partisanship shape local discussion of climate change after extreme weather

/by

Boudet, H. S., L. Giordono, C. Zanocco, H. Satein and H. Whitley (2020). Event attribution and partisanship shape local discussion of climate change after extreme weather. Nature Climate Change 10: 69–76.

How geographic distance and political ideology interact to influence public perception of unconventional oil/natural gas development

/by

Clarke, C. E., D. Bugden, P. S. Hart, R. C. Stedman, J. B. Jacquet, D. T. N. Evensen and H. S. Boudet (2016). How geographic distance and political ideology interact to influence public perception of unconventional oil/natural gas development. Energy Policy 97: 301-309.

Nuances of valuing resilience from microgrids

/by

Furqan, M. and H.S. Boudet (2024). Nuances of valuing resilience from microgrids. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2024.115236.

Disparities in reported extreme weather impacts in the United States by race, ethnicity, and income.

/by

Zanocco, C., J. Flora and H. S. Boudet (2022). Disparities in reported extreme weather impacts in the United States by race, ethnicity, and income. PLOS Climate. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pclm.0000026.

Public preferences in a shifting energy future: Comparing public views of eight energy sources in North America’s Pacific Northwest

/by

Hazboun, S. and H. S. Boudet (2020). Public preferences in a shifting energy future: Comparing public views of eight energy sources in North America’s Pacific Northwest. Energies 13(8): 1940.

Public opinion on energy development: The interplay of issue framing, top-of-mind associations, and political ideology

/by

Clarke, C. E., P. S. Hart, J. P. Schuldt, D. T. N. Evensen, H. S. Boudet, J. B. Jacquet and R. C. Stedman (2015). Public opinion on energy development: The interplay of issue framing, top-of-mind associations, and political ideology. Energy Policy 81: 131-140.

Understanding the roles, limits, and best practices for community benefit agreements in US offshore wind development

/by

Bingham J.A., E. Miller, L. Ruscetta, H.A. Taufiq, G. Stelmach, J. Firestone, T.R. Johnson, S. Hazboun and H.S. Boudet (2025). Understanding the roles, limits, and best practices for community benefit agreements in US offshore wind development. Ocean & Coastal Management. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107769